MBA Fever

CAT, GMAT, CET, XAT, IRMA, MAT, JMET, FMS, IIFT, SNAP, ATMA and other MBA entrance test related stuff.


Subscribe to mbafever

Shout Box

Guys We like Feedback Got a question or comment? Send Here

Archive

Critical Reasoning #9

Saturday, September 23, 2006


Studies of fatal automobile accidents reveal that, in the majority of cases in which one occupant of an automobile is killed while another survives, it is the passenger, not the driver, who is killed. It is ironic that the innocent passenger should suffer for the driver's carelessness, while the driver often suffers only minor injuries or none at all.


Which of the following is an assumption underlying the reasoning in the passage above?
(A) In most fatal automobile accidents, the driver of a car in which an occupant is killed is at fault.
(B) Drivers of automobiles are rarely killed in auto accidents.
(C) Most deaths in fatal automobile accidents are suffered by occupants of cars rather than by pedestrians.
(D) Auto safety experts should increase their efforts to provide protection for those in the passenger seats of automobiles.
(E) Automobile passengers sometimes play a contributing role in causing auto accidents.


Note: Post your answer along with an explanation if required. Highlight this note to check your answer. Answer: A

Previous Posts

  • Yale - 2006 Class Day Address
  • Office boy chasing MBA dream, lost son to malaria
  • Professor Laloo to deliver lecture to IIM-A students
  • Indra Nooyi's Graduation Remarks
  • Vocabulary Set 5 - A
  • Vocabulary Set 4 - A
  • CAT Bulletins - Hurry!!
  • Parts of Speech - The Noun
  • Parts of Speech
  • Intro - Sentence, Subject & Predicate
  • 3 Comments:

    At 8:40 PM,Blogger Bigg Boss said...

    Guys, if possible give a reason for the answer..

     
    At 10:54 PM,Blogger Ginni said...

    it's A..
    Cause-Effect relationship is discussed & A fits into the riddle.. :)
    nice blog..

     
    At 12:32 PM,Blogger Bigg Boss said...

    Thanks, Ginni

     

    Post a Comment