MBA Fever

CAT, GMAT, CET, XAT, IRMA, MAT, JMET, FMS, IIFT, SNAP, ATMA and other MBA entrance test related stuff.


Subscribe to mbafever

Shout Box

Guys We like Feedback Got a question or comment? Send Here

Archive

Critical Reasoning #6

Saturday, July 15, 2006


A law requiring companies to offer employees unpaid time off to care for their children will harm the economic competitiveness of our nation's businesses. Companies must be free to set their own employment policies without mandated parental-leave regulations.


Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion of the argument above?
(A) A parental-leave law will serve to strengthen the family as a social institution in this country.
(B) Many businesses in this country already offer employees some form of parental leave.
(C) Some of the countries with the most economically competitive businesses have strong parental-leave regulations.
(D) Only companies with one hundred or more employees would be subject to the proposed parental-leave law.
(E) In most polls, a majority of citizens say they favor passage of a parental-leave law.


Note: Post your answer along with an explanation if required. Highlight this note to check your answer. Answer: C



Previous Posts

  • Passage #3
  • Critical Reasoning #5
  • Critical Reasoning #4
  • Sentence Correction #5
  • Critical Reasoning #3
  • Sentence Correction #4
  • Passage #2
  • Critical Reasoning #2
  • Critical Reasoning #1
  • Passage #1
  • 0 Comments:

    Post a Comment